Religion, Atheism and Health

76

By secularist10

See all 5 photos

God and health

We have seen that religion and religious adherence are positively correlated with crime and teen pregnancy. What about health? Are more religious people healthier? Do more devout societies produce longer lives? We will look at American and international data to find the relationship between religion and health.

Religion, healthy lifestyles and wellbeing

Gallup conducted a very large study that indicates that very religious Americans (defined as those who attend religious services frequently and who take religion as an important part of daily life) tended to have healthier lifestyles than the moderately religious or nonreligious. Specifically, they smoke less, eat more fruits and vegetables and exercise more regularly.

At the same time, less religiously devout Americans tend to have higher overall wellbeing than more devout groups*. Specifically, Jews have the highest overall wellbeing (and, of all religious groups, are the least devout within their tradition). The second highest overall wellbeing is enjoyed by the nonreligious/ atheists/ agnostics, and the third-highest by Roman Catholics. Protestantism had the lowest wellbeing of all, whilst having one of the highest percentage of "very religious" adherents.

Even some people in the "nonreligious" grouping in the study attend religious services regularly, and have religion as an important part of their daily life. Thus although these people may not believe in God, following a religious lifestyle seems to have a positive effect in their lives. No doubt it is the discipline, regularity and dependability of that lifestyle that contributes to their wellbeing, along with the regular and sustained social interaction. Since this is a lifestyle assessment, there is no indication that specific beliefs lead to better health outcomes.

*UPDATE:

Gallup has updated the data in this study, and it now indicates a positive relationship between religious devotion and overall wellbeing. The updated study is here. Despite this overall trend, Jews still have the highest wellbeing overall, even though they are the least religious as a group (as the subtitle of Gallup's article points out). This major wrinkle in the data points to a more complex relationship between religious adherence and health than we may initially expect. Mormons have the second-highest overall wellbeing, and are a very devout group. Meanwhile, Roman Catholics have higher wellbeing than Protestants, although they tend to be less devout than Protestants. This all indicates anything but a clear positive relationship.

Source: Staks Rosch

Religion and health by state

Among the American states, there is an extraordinarily strong correlation between religious adherence and negative health outcomes. To see this, we can consider three measures:

  • State rates of church and synagogue attendance in 2006, according to Gallup.
  • The importance of religion in people's daily lives, by state, in 2009, according to Gallup.
  • A ranking of the states according to a comprehensive set of health indicators for 2010, by America's Health Rankings. The health measures include rates of smoking, obesity, binge drinking and high school graduation.

Using Microsoft Excel, I created the charts below showing the relationship between religiosity and health by state. The highest ranking states on health include Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Massachusetts. These are also some of the least religious states. The lowest ranking states on health include Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas and Texas. These are also some of the most religious states. States that go against the trend include Utah (religious and healthy) and Nevada (nonreligious and unhealthy).

Nevertheless, the data demonstrate the very strong correlation between negative rankings on health, and religiosity in a state.

Health and religious attendance

There is a negative relationship between and health and religiosity in a state.
There is a negative relationship between and health and religiosity in a state.
Source: Gallup and America's Health Rankings

Health and religion in daily life

There is a negative relationship between health and religiosity among the states.
There is a negative relationship between health and religiosity among the states.
Source: Gallup and America's Health Rankings

Religion and health around the world

Internationally, there is a negative correlation between religiosity and health. Considering life expectancy at birth as used in the UN Human Development Index, we can see that the highest life expectancy is generally seen in the least religious countries, and vice versa. The top countries in life expectancy include Japan, Australia, Sweden, Norway and Canada. The bottom include Sierra Leone, Senegal, Malawi, Tanzania and Afghanistan.

The former group have among the highest proportion of people for whom religion is not important in their daily life (all greater than 50%, ranging from 55 to 78%), and the latter have among the lowest (2 to 3%).

Religion and health: conclusions

There are a variety of reasons why religion and health might have a negative relationship. People going through health difficulties, as well as their surrounding network of friends and family, are some of the most likely to seek comfort and promise in higher or supernatural powers. Like other social maladies, bad health is tied to poverty and poor education, both of which are, in turn, positive influences on religious adherence.

In addition, religion itself can directly impact health in a negative way if religious beliefs or practices create unhealthy situations. The Catholic practice of the Eucharist involves dozens or hundreds of people drinking from the same cup at the same time, as well as sharing germs in other ways. More dramatically, Jehovah's Witnesses are against blood transfusions for purely religious reasons, directly resulting in untold deaths and injuries. Many Muslims believe that a Muslim woman should ideally be treated by a Muslim woman doctor. A lack of Muslim or female doctors in a community may cause difficulty and negative health outcomes for such believers.

Many religious people may believe that praying or increasing their devotional practices is enough to heal a loved one or improve their health, and thus ignore more scientific and secular medical options. Even some medical professionals may withhold medical treatment for religious reasons.

On the other hand, religion and health do sometimes have a positive relationship. Religion can give people a strong sense of purpose, direction and security in their lives. The discipline, order and regularity that religious membership confers often has positive health effects, particularly in the psychological realm. In addition, regular social interaction and renewing of a community spirit has been shown to have a very positive effect on people's health, and religions such as Christianity, Judaism and Islam feature community activities prominently.

Peter Popoff, Faith Healer

Comments

Austinstar profile image

Austinstar Level 7 Commenter 12 months ago

I have heard the statement that the bible contains the cure to every illness. Faith healers are a strange bunch. While it is true that religious attitude can bring on the placebo effect, modern medicine still works amazingly better.

aguasilver profile image

aguasilver Level 6 Commenter 12 months ago

Love the video, exposes the fakes that give Christianity a bad name, sure, they exist, easy money on earth and a bad future for eternity!

As for the statistics, you took them from three different surveys held over a four year period, 'evidence' that I doubt you would accept from a believer.

But you have your axe to grind, and you grind it well.

"Even some people in the "nonreligious" grouping in the study attend religious services regularly, and have religion as an important part of their daily life. Thus although these people may not believe in God, following a religious lifestyle seems to have a positive effect in their lives. No doubt it is the discipline, regularity and dependability of that lifestyle that contributes to their wellbeing, along with the regular and sustained social interaction. Since this is a lifestyle assessment, there is no indication that specific beliefs lead to better health outcomes."

Or it could be that being in the presence of God and paying at least titular observance of His name means that God was able to bless them more than secularists.

I'm not even going to bother following these comments, your team will make the normal remarks, and life's too short to waste time on this sort of stuff.

secularist10 profile image

secularist10 Hub Author 12 months ago

Austinstar

I don't know, those Medieval Christians were a pretty devout and Bible-believing bunch, they seemed to have a lot of illnesses, lol.

secularist10 profile image

secularist10 Hub Author 12 months ago

Aguasilver

Haha, hey man, nobody's putting a gun to your head. If you don't want to comment, then don't comment. If you do, then you're welcome.

The faith healer thing was intended more for entertainment purposes, BTW.

Statistics--I assume you are referring to the section on the states. Well, you are incorrect. I would most certainly accept this analysis from a religious believer, because it's not exactly comparing rates of church attendance in the 15th century to health outcomes in 2005. I happen to understand that statistics are never perfect.

The difference is only a few years, and American society and culture was, for all intents and purposes, EXACTLY the same during that period. Do you honestly think that self-reported rates of church attendance in Alabama relative to Vermont were THAT different in 2010 versus 2006? Come on!

Moreover, the second chart shows the relationship between religion in daily life and the health rank--the two studies are separated by only 1 year! ONE YEAR!

You're just engaging in sour grapes, no real rebuttal to the data. I know it sticks in your craw that the stats say what they do, but them's the breaks.

"But you have your axe to grind, and you grind it well."

My only axe is the data. Show me better data... on all counts--national, state and international.

"Or it could be that being in the presence of God and paying at least titular observance of His name means that God was able to bless them more than secularists."

Well, if this was true, then the data would not say what they do--i.e. that religious populations are generally less healthy than less religious ones. Oh, but I forget, God works in mysterious ways. :)

The psychological and social effects of religious practice are much more reasonable explanations. There is no need for a supernatural explanation.

Beverly Stevens profile image

Beverly Stevens 12 months ago

I like your article and your video. It's easy to see where aguasilver was coming from. Religious believers don't like to see facts and reason, they use faith as their guide--no matter how much it deviates from truth. It's like seeing a three year old on Christmas morning opening presents and saying to him, "There is no Santa Claus." The message just doesn't get through after one devotes a lifetime of energy, money and time to something (false), it's hard to face truth.

Austinstar profile image

Austinstar Level 7 Commenter 12 months ago

If even ONE child had died because of the parent's refusal to consent for modern medical treatment, it would be a tragedy. But the fact is that children die EVERY DAY from lack of treatment, lack of emotional support and the worst of all - downright abuse and neglect.

And yet they profess to be "Christians".

I have personally witnessed the death of babies, condemned by their parents because they don't allow blood exchange treatments. I've had to testify in court over this.

I've seen many, many abused and neglected children. I've seen a baby covered in green slime because its mother threw it in the trash dumpster.

Try working with these things and still believe in "faith healing". What a farce.

secularist10 profile image

secularist10 Hub Author 11 months ago

Thank you, Beverly!

So true. We see the same tendency among creationist religious believers who try to "explain away" countless facts in favor of evolution, or any other idea that clashes with their assumptions about the world.

What many of them don't realize is that many atheists and secularists actually believe what they do BECAUSE of the facts and data that support the arguments. Imagine that. Ideas and values based on facts!

secularist10 profile image

secularist10 Hub Author 11 months ago

Powerful stuff, Austinstar. Unfortunately delusion and what one wants to believe is often more powerful.

The human mind has an incredible capacity for empathy and cooperation, but also an incredible capacity for blocking events and experiences and twisting them to fit deeply-held assumptions.

In the long run, the only answer is more knowledge, more information and more education.

James Kunz 2 months ago

Your evidence for your argument that religion correlates with overall poor health is very weak. It doesn't at all account for the fact that 10 of the 15 most religious states are also within the 15 poorest states. You need to account other variables such as poverty in when looking at overall health.

James Kunz 2 months ago

The evidence you have on this article is so unscientific.

James Kunz 2 months ago

And the overall wellbeing article, which can't be accessed, doesn't help your point since it names a religious group as having better health than nonbelievers. Moreover, because you didn't actually leave the sources in citation form at the bottom of your article, now we're left not being able to find the article on wellbeing that the Gallop poll is reinvestigating. Let's try to be more academic, please.

James Kunz 2 months ago

It gets worse. You mention that secular countries have greater life expectancies than more religious countries. You include Westernized nations such as those in Europe. But you again don't account for the other variables. Most Westernized countries are far more wealthy than others, so it's easier for them to maintain good health. I can't believe you don't even mention this variable in the article. Let's try to use more reason and critical thinking.

secularist10 profile image

secularist10 Hub Author 2 months ago

James:

Well, I can't tell if you're not paying attention, or if you are serious, or what. I will just assume you are serious and try to explain some things here.

"Your evidence for your argument that religion correlates with overall poor health is very weak."

Well, the evidence is right up there in the data. The lines are drawn on the charts. The data points are all there, clear as day for anyone to see. There is a clear correlation between religious adherence and poor health. This does not mean it is a CAUSAL relationship, but it is clearly CORRELATED. This correlation is a fact, it cannot be disputed. Therefore the real question is, why does this correlation exist? More on that in a moment.

"It doesn't at all account for the fact that 10 of the 15 most religious states are also within the 15 poorest states. You need to account other variables such as poverty in when looking at overall health."

I don't need to account for any such variables do demonstrate a simple correlational relationship. Yet I do address the issue of poverty in the conclusion of this article. Again, more on that in a moment.

"Moreover, because you didn't actually leave the sources in citation form at the bottom of your article, now we're left not being able to find the article on wellbeing that the Gallop poll is reinvestigating. Let's try to be more academic, please."

Let's try a reasonable criticism, please. This is obviously not a scholarly article. I have no obligation or need to name my sources in a formal bibliography. The sources are linked throughout the article.

Clearly the Gallup page I linked to was altered since I published this article. This happens frequently in online writing and is a ridiculous thing for you to criticize. I have updated that section to reflect Gallup's updated data. The new data do indeed indicate a stronger relationship between religious adherence and health. This contradicts the other data I cite that demonstrate the opposite relationship.

Thanks for letting me know, though.

"It gets worse."

Clearly.

"Most Westernized countries are far more wealthy than others, so it's easier for them to maintain good health. I can't believe you don't even mention this variable in the article."

Well, I can't believe you didn't read the concluding section of this article, where I say:

***

"There are a variety of reasons why religion and health might have a negative relationship... Like other social maladies, bad health is tied to poverty and poor education, both of which are, in turn, positive influences on religious adherence."

***

"Let's try to use more reason and critical thinking."

Let's try to actually read before commenting. :)

Austinstar profile image

Austinstar Level 7 Commenter 2 months ago

If only they would actually READ and UNDERSTAND what they are reading. I realize they are trained from birth to see and hear only the parts that appear to support their cognitive abilities, but if a person makes it to college, they should learn to put facts together and see a conclusion. If only...

secularist10 profile image

secularist10 Hub Author 2 months ago

Indeed. I always say, if you have a big charge, you better bring big evidence to support it.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working